|
From CDTC Chair Mike Schell:
Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced two decisions concerning the president's power to fire agency commissioners/board members. One concerned the Federal Trade Commission and the other the Federal Reserve Board. They are Trump v. Slaughter (FTC) and Trump v. Cook (FRB). One overruled a 90-year precedent and permitted the firing of an FTC Commissioner. The other decision denied authorization for firing a member of the Federal Reserve Board. I believe there is no principled distinction to rationalize the two different results. Essentially that issue is one of the key differences between the Court's opinion (Roberts) and the dissent (Sotomayor, joined by Kagan and Jackson). However, a more fundamental problem exists with these decisions. To see the problem, you should either watch or read Paul Krugman's assessment. It is worrisome at best and potentially devastating. Watch here: "The Court Sides with Dictatorship -- and Chaos."
0 Comments
by Thomas H. Clarke, Jr.
Chatham Massachusetts is a premier Cape Cod hub for commercial and recreational fishing, offering a mix of active working piers, co-ops, and offshore charters. Chatham sits at the elbow of Cape Cod, giving anglers direct access to the Atlantic Ocean, Nantucket Sound, Pleasant Bay, and more than two dozen freshwater ponds. The town supports saltwater fishing, freshwater fishing, sport fishing charters, shell fishing, and Fish Pier viewing. Fishing in Chatham MA draws visitors from across the country because the variety of species and access points is difficult to match on the East Coast. Striped bass run strong from late spring through fall, bluefin tuna hold in offshore waters, freshwater ponds produce trout and bass all season, and the working waterfront at the Fish Pier gives non-anglers a front-row seat to the commercial catch. My dear Friends --
June 18 was a day that will be marked as a turning point in America's embarkation upon a Second Reconstruction. We are once again purposefully re-engaging in the Constitution's mandate to "form a more perfect union." I know this because of what we saw in New York City and in Chicago -- and, yes, even in Versailles on Wednesday. Let me start with Versailles. It was anything but a heroic day for America as the President signed the memorandum of understanding purporting to end his war against Iran. Indeed, it was a shameful, embarrassing, profligate surrender. However, it wasn't the kind of surrender that opens the door to peace. It was a surrender of attention, of interest, of involvement, of effort. Trump said it himself. The war was "boring." He was tired of it. He no longer wished to tolerate its vexation. And so he asked for what amounted to an invoice for Iran's re-opening the Strait of Hormuz and for a 60-day conversation on the subject of Iran's uranium enrichment program. It was expensive. But it was acceptable because what Trump really expects to get is removal of the whole mess from public attention. I doubt very much that any part of the MOU will be implemented, and I doubt he thinks it will be. Iran will charge fees for transit through the Strait; Iran will continue its nuclear program; and there will be no $300 billion reconstruction program. Effectively, Trump is leaving a much strengthened, much more formidable Iran to be dealt with by the next cadre of American leadership -- including his successor. He is also leaving a diminished and forsaken American ally Israel to deal with its issues in the region more in isolation. Where is the sun in all this? Whatever diminution in stature the U.S. has suffered and whatever isolation Israel is now experiencing -- they are dwarfed by the self-imposed emasculation that will be Trump's fate for the remainder of his time -- in office and in life. Of course, this is neither beneficial nor advantageous for the United States today. It does, however, help frame the vision for our Second Reconstruction in the world. In perhaps oversimplified terms, it is our rejoining the community of nations dedicated to the values we have pursued since our national birth. Values which were highlighted and reaffirmed in both New York and Chicago yesterday. New York. I was there. New York came together in celebration of the victory of one of its professional sports teams -- the New York Knicks. It was a championship victory that hadn't happened for 53 years. What it generated in the City was both inspiring and purgative. I won't try to describe it, but will instead quote a few of the Mayor's words just below and will cite you to a fuller description that appeared in Professor Richardson's Letters from an American today: Over these past weeks, as the Knicks kept winning, our city has come together as one. Neighbors invited neighbors over. Strangers high fived one another in the street. Subway conductors sang their announcements and bus drivers danced behind the wheel. So often, when this city comes together, it is because we are forced to by a moment of tragedy or adversity. What a gift it is to be brought together by pure, unfiltered joy. For as long as we live, we will remember this feeling of a city together, a city alive, a city overcome by happiness. But let's not pretend that this was inevitable. If you will allow me, I want to travel back in time eight days. Game 4. Nine minutes and 33 seconds left in the fourth quarter. The Knicks are down 20. The analytics guys, the sports betting companies, the pundits who watch from far away do what they do. They run the numbers. They calculate the odds. They write the Knicks off. Whatever else we do, we are not going to write off the America built over 250 years of endeavor. We are going to keep up the search and the effort. In Chicago -- specifically the South Side of Chicago -- there was a different sort of celebration. It was a gathering to recognize and celebrate the opening of President Obama's Presidential Center -- a learning center dedicated to educating all who accept the opportunity about both his presidency and especially the stories of the American people. The American people who are the strength and sinew of our pursuit of a more perfect union. As President Obama observed in his speech yesterday: And since we’re a few weeks away from America’s 250th birthday, it is worth remembering just how radical the whole idea of self-government really was back in 1776. To that point, human history was a tale of conquest and caste and rigid hierarchies, a world where the strong dominated the weak, where power and wealth and status flowed through lineage and the many were ruled by the few. But out of the fire and steel of a revolution, a different story took flight on this continent, a declaration that we are all created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, and that in the newly independent United States, there will be no kings or lords, no serfs or subjects, but only citizens, each of us free to pursue our own version of happiness, and able to determine our collective faith through an elected representative government.It had not been done. And because it hadn’t been done before, the success of this experiment was never a given. In forming our union, the founders fell terribly short of the Declaration’s promise, leaving slavery intact, allowing states to restrict the franchise to white men who owned property, but in drafting a Constitution and a Bill of Rights, they did have the foresight, the genius to provide us with a framework that allows each generation to make our union more perfect. And over more than two centuries, through petitions and protests, marches and strikes, moral appeals from the pulpit and conversations at the family dinner table, men and women from all walks of life of every color, every faith, every region took up the cause of democracy and made it their own, until “We the people” came to include not just some of us, but all of us. Again, I cite you to Professor Richardson's entire post, which offers a portrait of the day in Chicago and what it may mean for our future -- apart from its celebration of leadership in recent history. Of course, we have a distance to travel and much work to be done, but surely yesterday gives us confidence that we are on the path and that we are justified in believing that "Yes, we can!" At the same time, as Mayor Mamdani observed in retrospect "But let's not pretend that this was inevitable." Our Second Reconstruction is not inevitable, but it is surely on the horizon and it surely can be accomplished. Yes, we can. Sunny Side Up. Mike Editorial – Mike Schell – June 3, 2026
Chatham's Housing Future Is on the Line. The ZBA Must Say Yes. Twenty-three years ago, the people of Chatham made a promise to themselves. At the 2003 Annual Town Meeting, residents unanimously adopted a Comprehensive Plan with a clear, measurable goal: bring affordable housing to 10% of Chatham's year-round housing stock by 2015. It was an ambitious target, but a necessary one – a recognition that the town's essential workers, young families, and longtime residents were being priced out of the community they helped build. We are now eleven years past that deadline. Chatham's Subsidized Housing Inventory stands at 4.81%. In the past fifteen years, the town has added a mere ten units to that inventory. Ten units in fifteen years. To reach the 10% goal today would require 192 new affordable homes. The promise made in 2003 has not been kept. Now, at long last, Chatham has a genuine opportunity to begin making it right. The Zoning Board of Appeals is currently considering a comprehensive permit application from Pennrose LLC to develop affordable housing on Meetinghouse Road. The ZBA should grant that permit. The case for doing so is overwhelming – legally, financially, morally, and as a matter of simple civic obligation. **This Project Is Chatham's Own** Let us be clear about what this project is and how it came to be. This is not a developer who arrived uninvited and proposed to impose unwanted housing on a reluctant town. Quite the opposite. In December 2021, Chatham's own Affordable Housing Trust voted unanimously to pursue the Meetinghouse Road property from the Catholic Archdiocese of Fall River. The town purchased that land in 2022 specifically for affordable housing. In early 2024, Chatham issued a formal Request for Proposals seeking a developer to build on it. Pennrose responded to that invitation. The town selected Pennrose in July 2024 and negotiated a detailed Land Disposition Agreement, executed in February 2025, with the Town Manager, Select Board representatives, the Affordable Housing Trust, and the Finance Committee all at the table. Pennrose is here because Chatham asked them to be here. Every official step in this project – the land acquisition, the RFP, the developer selection, the negotiated agreement – was taken by Chatham's own duly constituted bodies acting in the public interest. We all would do well to remember that as the ZBA deliberates. **The Project Will Strengthen Chatham's Schools** One of the less discussed but most important benefits of affordable housing is what it does for the long-term vitality (and viability) of a community's school system. Chatham, like many Cape Cod towns, has struggled with declining school enrollment as younger families are pushed out by housing costs. Affordable housing pushes back against that trend. Pennrose recently completed its 62-unit Phare development in Orleans. In the school year following its opening, Orleans Elementary School enrolled 21 additional students – a surge the school's principal described as well outside the norm and directly correlated to the new housing. Pennrose's Village at Nauset Green in Eastham tells a similar story: 40 children under 18 now live there. There is every reason to expect that Chatham will experience comparable gains. That is not a burden. That is a lifeline for a school system that depends on enrollment to sustain its programs, its teachers, and its future. **The Financial Case Is Compelling** Beyond the town's moral commitment to this project, the financial terms are extraordinary. Pennrose is undertaking a $28.5 million development at no cost to the town. Under the Land Disposition Agreement, Pennrose will actually pay Chatham $300,000 in cash at closing, plus a $200,000 promissory note – meaning Chatham will receive $300,000 for land it purchased for the express purpose of creating affordable housing which it can immediately rededicate to other housing affordable housing. Compare that to the competing proposal not selected: it would have required Chatham to contribute a $4 million subordinated loan to the project and transfer the land for free. Or compare it to the town's planned investment of at least $3 million to produce just 14 affordable and attainable units on Stepping Stones Road. The Pennrose project will produce more units at a far lower cost to Chatham taxpayers. This is not a close call on the numbers. **On Density and Design** Some opponents of this project have raised concerns about density. Those concerns deserve a measured response. In response to feedback from the ZBA and the public, Pennrose contracted to acquire the property adjacent to the project, enlarging the project site by 15% and reducing unit density by nearly 14%, to approximately 10.2 units per acre. That figure is barely above the 10-unit-per-acre metric the town's own Planning Board has recommended for inclusionary zoning in the West Chatham Neighborhood Center. Moreover, the project site is surrounded on three sides by roughly 10 acres of open, unimproved land – including Twine Fields, a 7.5-acre meadow beloved by birdwatchers – almost certainly never to be developed. This is not a project being shoehorned into a dense neighborhood. **The Law Has Its Own Answer** The ZBA's role in this process is governed by Chapter 40B of the Massachusetts General Laws and 760 CMR 56.07-56.09. Under that framework, general community opposition, preferences for lower density or single-family character or ownership over rental, and unsupported traffic concerns do not meet that standard. They never have. The law was designed precisely to prevent those arguments from defeating housing that a community genuinely needs. Chatham's need for affordable housing is not in dispute. It is urgent, it is documented, and it is the product of more than two decades of inadequate progress against a goal this town set for itself. **A Final Word** The ZBA is the last official body standing between a 23-year civic commitment and its fulfillment. Many people and institutions – town meeting voters, selectmen, housing trustees, town managers, finance committee members – have contributed their efforts to reach this moment. The Zoning Board of Appeals now has the opportunity, and the responsibility, to bring that work to a successful conclusion. Grant the permit. Chatham has waited long enough. |
Archives |





RSS Feed